Again, I have yet to read your document in its entirety, however I was hoping you would have the patience and interest in reading my theory in context. Your response makes it clear that you have no interest in understanding what I have written and simply skimmed for one sentence to disagree with.

The sentence fragment you cherry picked is from a sentence that begins, “However, if one interprets increasing time dilation as a stretching of spacetime…”.
And the sentence after states that I “prefer to model time dilation as a radiated particle field in a fixed metric space. “
I clearly do not endorse an altering metric of space and prefer a static Euclidean model. That he sentence you picked is specifically apologetic to relate the observed effect to what most attribute to warped spacetime. My goal is to form bridges of understanding, not to make assumptions on one’s position based on misinterpreted fragments.

I would have hoped the possibility of finding someone like minded would be of interest.

If the Medium article is insufficient detail, here is the link that was at the top of that article where you can find my more exhaustive theory on PDF:
https://whetscience.com/DilationFlooding.html

Some additional information here:
https://whetscience.com/DilationFloodingMath.html

Or blow me off again.